On the Paradigm Shift of the Overall Urban Design in China

Facing a period of major change that is rarely seen in a century, China formulates the 14th Five-Year Plan and places emphasis on promoting high-quality development. In this context, the overall urban design has become a crucial and systematic tool for high-quality urban development. However, there are bottlenecks in the cognition of nature, content scope and transmission mechanisms of the current overall urban design in China. The paper interprets the emerging demands of the 14th Five-Year Plan on urban design in terms of new value-quality priority, new dynamic-space performance, new target-region coordination and new path-refined governance. Based on the new trend and appeal, the multi-dimensional thinking integrated with the major tasks of urban design are proposed accordingly, which is the biomass thinking in ecological, production and living element, the strategic thinking in spatial structure, the systematic thinking in the cityscape, the low-carbon thinking in urban form, the governance thinking in public space, the user thinking in design implementation. The paper explores the possibility of transforming the value thinking and technical system of urban design in China and provides a breakthrough path for the urban planning and design industry to better respond to the propositions of the country’s 14th Five-Year Plan.





References:
REFERENCES
[1] Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China (R). The Guidelines for the Preparation of Municipal Territorial Spatial Plans (for Trial Implementation). Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China, 2020.
[2] Krier L. The Reconstruction of the City (J). Rational Architecture, 1978:455-59.
[3] Christopher Alexander, Hajo Neis, Artemis Anninou and Ingrid King (M). A New Theory of Urban Design. Oxford University Press: 1987.
[4] Edmund N. Bacon. Design of Cities (M). Boston: MIT Press, 1974.
[5] Jinping Xi. Excerpt from the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China(M). Foreign Languages Press: 2018.
[6] Appleyard Donald. Three Kinds of Urban Design Practice (M). New York: Institute of Urban Design, 1982.
[7] Guangjun Jin. Urban design: how to localize and implement in China? (J). Urban Plan, 2018, 42(03): 41-49.
[8] Jie Fan. High-quality development of national territory space governance and regional economic layout during 14th five-year plan in China (J). Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020,35(07):796-805. DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20200509003.
[9] Zhi Yao, Zhihao Zheng. Theoretical explanation and data verification of the decreased driving function of land economy (J). China Land Science, 2019,33(09):84-92+100.
[10] Yan Tang. Urban design transformation in the era of refined governance: a binary thinking (J). City Planning Review, 2020,44(02):20-26.
[11] Yiying Zhou, Yi Zhang. Urban master design for plain cities (J). Planner, 2018, 34(01): 59-64.
[12] Neuman M. Regional design: recovering a great landscape architecture and urban planning tradition (J). Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 47(3-4): 115-128.
[13] Xiao Wu, Chenghui Wang, Min Yin, Chenli Qian. Three questions on comprehensive urban design (J). City Planning Review, 2021, 45(02):73-83.
[14] Haisu Pan, Yang Tang, Jinyu Wu. Spatial Planning Strategy for Low Carbon Cities in China (J). Urban Planning Forum, 2008(06):57-64.
[15] Songtao Wu, Enzhang Guo. On the formulation of urban design guidelines at the stage of detailed planning (J). City Planning Review, 2001(03):74-77.
[16] Thomas Hartmann, Mathias Jehling. From diversity to justice – Unraveling pluralistic rationalities in urban design (J). Cities, 2018.