Numerical Buckling of Composite Cylindrical Shells under Axial Compression Using Asymmetric Meshing Technique (AMT)

This paper presents the details of a numerical study of
buckling and post buckling behaviour of laminated carbon fiber
reinforced plastic (CFRP) thin-walled cylindrical shell under axial
compression using asymmetric meshing technique (AMT) by
ABAQUS. AMT is considered to be a new perturbation method to
introduce disturbance without changing geometry, boundary
conditions or loading conditions. Asymmetric meshing affects both
predicted buckling load and buckling mode shapes. Cylindrical shell
having lay-up orientation [0^o/+45^o/-45^o/0^o] with radius to thickness
ratio (R/t) equal to 265 and length to radius ratio (L/R) equal to 1.5 is
analysed numerically. A series of numerical simulations
(experiments) are carried out with symmetric and asymmetric
meshing to study the effect of asymmetric meshing on predicted
buckling behaviour. Asymmetric meshing technique is employed in
both axial direction and circumferential direction separately using
two different methods, first by changing the shell element size and
varying the total number elements, and second by varying the shell
element size and keeping total number of elements constant. The
results of linear analysis (Eigenvalue analysis) and non-linear
analysis (Riks analysis) using symmetric meshing agree well with
analytical results. The results of numerical analysis are presented in
form of non-dimensional load factor, which is the ratio of buckling
load using asymmetric meshing technique to buckling load using
symmetric meshing technique. Using AMT, load factor has about 2%
variation for linear eigenvalue analysis and about 2% variation for
non-linear Riks analysis. The behaviour of load end-shortening curve
for pre-buckling is same for both symmetric and asymmetric meshing
but for asymmetric meshing curve behaviour in post-buckling
becomes extraordinarily complex. The major conclusions are:
different methods of AMT have small influence on predicted
buckling load and significant influence on load displacement curve
behaviour in post buckling; AMT in axial direction and AMT in
circumferential direction have different influence on buckling load
and load displacement curve in post-buckling.





References:
[1] R.M. Jones, Buckling of Bars, Plates, and Shells, Bull Ridge
Corporation, 2006.
[2] A.B. Sabir, A.C. Lock, The applications of finite elements to large
deflection geometrically nonlinear behaviour of cylindrical shells, in:
C.A. Brebbia, H. Tottenham (Eds.) Variational Methods in
Engineering, Southampton University Press, University of
Southampton, Southampton, GB, 1972.
[3] B.L. Wardle, Buckling and damage resistance of transversely loaded
composite shells, in: Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1998.
[4] B.L. Wardle, Solution to the Incorrect Benchmark Shell-Buckling
Problem, AIAA Journal, 46 (2008) 381-387.
[5] B.L. Wardle, P.A. Lagace, M.A. Tudela, Buckling response of
transversely loaded composite shells, Part 2: Numerical Analysis,
AIAA Journal, 42 (2004) 1465-1473.
[6] T. Zhang, W. Gu, The Secondary Buckling and Design Criterion of
Composite Laminated Cylindrical Shells, Applied Composite
Materials, (2011) 1-15.
[7] C. Bisagni, Experimental Buckling of Thin Composite Cylinders in
Compression, AIAA Journal, 37 (1999) 276-278.
[8] K.J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis,
Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1982.
[9] ABAQUS, Theory and user's manuals, in: Hibbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen.
(Eds.), Providence, 2010.
[10] C. Bisagni, Numerical analysis and experimental correlation of
composite shell buckling and post-buckling, Composites Part B:
Engineering, 31 (2000) 655-667.
[11] E. Riks, An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and
buckling problems, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 15
(1979) 529-551.