Need for Standardization of Manual Inspection in Small and Medium-Scale Manufacturing Industries

In the field of production, characterization of surface
roughness plays a vital role in assessing the quality of a manufactured
product. The defined parameters for this assessment, each, have their
own drawbacks in describing a profile surface. From the purview of
small-scale and medium-scale industries, an increase in time spent for
manual inspection of a product for various parameters adds to the
cost of the product. In order to reduce this, a uniform and established
standard is necessary for quantifying a profile of a manufactured
product. The inspection procedure in the small and medium-scale
manufacturing units at Jigani Industrial area, Bangalore, was
observed. The parameters currently in use in those industries are
described in the paper and a change in the inspection method is
proposed.

Authors:



References:
[1] D.J. Whitehouse, Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology (second
edition), Taylor and Francis group, 2011, ch. 2.
[2] T.V. Vorburger, J. Raja, Surface Finish Metrology Tutorial, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Gaithesburg, 1990, ch. 3-6.
[3] E.S. Gadelmawla, M.M. Koura, T.M.A. Maksoud, I.M. Elewa, H.H.
Soliman, “Roughness parameters”, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, Volume 123, Issue 1, pp. 133-145, 10 April 2002.
[4] ISO 25178:2012 Geometric Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface
texture: areal; Part 2: terms, definitions and surface texture parameters.
[5] ASME B46.1-2002, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
New York.
[6] James R. Evans, William M. Lindsay, The Management and Control of
Quality (8th edition), CENGAGE learning, 2011, ch. 11-13.