Mnemotopic Perspectives: Communication Design as Stabilizer for the Memory of Places

The ancestral relationship between humans and geographical environment has long been at the center of an interdisciplinary dialogue, which sees one of its main research nodes in the relationship between memory and places. Given its deep complexity, this symbiotic connection continues to look for a proper definition that appears increasingly negotiated by different disciplines. Numerous fields of knowledge are involved, from anthropology to semiotics of space, from photography to architecture, up to subjects traditionally far from these reasonings. This is the case of Design of Communication, a young discipline, now confident in itself and its objectives, aimed at finding and investigating original forms of visualization and representation, between sedimented knowledge and new technologies. In particular, Design of Communication for the Territory offers an alternative perspective to the debate, encouraging the reactivation and reconstruction of the memory of places. Recognizing mnemotopes as a cultural object of vertical interpretation of the memory-place relationship, design can become a real mediator of the territorial fixation of memories, making them increasingly accessible and perceptible, contributing to build a topography of memory. According to a mnemotopic vision, Communication Design can support the passage from a memory in which the observer participates only as an individual to a collective form of memory. A mnemotopic form of Communication Design can, through geolocation and content map-based systems, make chronology a topography rooted in the territory and practicable; it can be useful to understand how the perception of the memory of places changes over time, considering how to insert them in the contemporary world. Mnemotopes can be materialized in different format of translation, editing and narration and then involved in complex systems of communication. The memory of places, therefore, if stabilized by the tools offered by Communication Design, can make visible ruins and territorial stratifications, illuminating them with new communicative interests that can be shared and participated.

• C. Galasso

• Memory of places
• design of communication
• territory
• mnemotope
• topography of memory.

[1] J. Agnew, G. Toal, K. Mitchell, A companion to political geography. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.
[2] J. Assmann, Cultural memory and early civilization. Writing, remembrance and political imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[3] M. Augé, Rovine e macerie: il senso del tempo. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2004.
[4] M. Bakhtin, The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981, p. 84-86.
[5] R. Barthes, The Rustle of Language. Berkley, Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1989, pp. 58-59.
[6] M. Bassanelli, Oltre il memoriale: le tracce, lo spazio, il ricordo. Milano: Mimesis, 2015.
[7] G. Baule, C. Galasso, “An answer to the complex representation of territory. The fertile ground of mnemotopes and design of communication”. In Cumulus Conference, Design Cultures, Roma, June 8-11, 2021.
[8] G. Baule, M. Quaggiotto, “Communication of the territory and cartographic interfaces. The spatial turn in communication design”. Cumulus Conference, The Virtuous Circle Design Culture and Experimentation, Milano, June 3-7, 2015.
[9] S. Bednarek, “Mnemotopika polska”. Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Number 1 (11), 2012, pp. 94-111.
[10] C. Bilsel, “Architecture and the Social Frameworks of Memory: A Postscript to Maurice Halbwachs’ Collective Memory” International Journal of Architecture & Planning, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp. 01-09.
[11] H. Caplan, Rhetorica ad Herennium. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954.
[12] E. Casey, Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987.
[13] S. De Nardi, The Routledge handbook of memory and place. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, 2020, pp. 117-119.
[14] G. Dickinson, C. Blair, B. L. Ott, Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 2010, pp. 26-57.
[15] C. Di Pasquale, Antropologia della memoria: il ricordo come fatto culturale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2018, pp- 132-137.
[16] J. Donohoe, The Betweenness of Monuments. In Interpreting Nature: The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.
[17] A. Erll, A. Nünning, Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2008.
[18] V. Fortunati, E. Agazzi, Memoria e saperi: percorsi transdisciplinari. Roma: Meltemi, 2007, pp. 531-546.
[19] C. Galasso, Zone di memoria. Il design per gli archivi del territorio. Milano: FreancoAngeli, 2018.
[20] M. Halbwachs, Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: F. Alcan, 1925.
[21] M. Halbwachs, The collective memory, New York: Harper & Row, 1980, pp. 139-140.
[22] M. Halbwachs, La topographie légendaire des Evangiles en Terre Sainte: Etude de mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1941.
[23] M. Isnenghi, I luoghi della memoria: simboli e miti dell'Italia unita. Roma: Editori Laterza, 1998.
[24] P. Nora, Le lieux de la mémoire. Paris: Gallimard, (1984-92).
[25] P. Nora, “Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire”. Representations, 26: 7–25.
[26] N. Pethes, J. Ruchatz, Dizionario della memoria e del ricordo, Milano: Mondadori, 2002.
[27] M. Quaggiotto, “A New Atlas for Abstract Spaces. Visual Tools for the Exploration of Complex Contexts”. D. Durling, R. Bousbaci, L. Chen, P. Gauthier, T. Poldma, S. Roworth-Stokes, E. Stolterman, Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010, 7-9 July, Montreal, Canada.
[28] M. Quaggiotto, Cartografie del sapere: interfacce per l'accesso agli spazi della conoscenza. Milano FrancoAngeli, 2012.
[29] P. Ricoeur, Memory, history, forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004, pp. 58–68.
[30] Z. Segal, B. Vannieuwenhuyze, Motion in Maps, Maps in Motion, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020
[31] G. Testori, I segreti di Milano. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1958.
[32] J. Van Rookhuijzen, Herodotus and the topography of Xerxes’ invasion. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2020, pp. 5-19.
[33] A. Warburg, R. Ohrt, A. Heil, Bilderatlas Mnemosyne: the original. Berlin Hatje Cantz, 2020.
[34] F. Yates, The art of memory. Chicago: The university of Chicago press, 1966.
[35] J. Young, The texture of memory: Holocaust memorials and meaning. New Haven: Yale university press, 1993.
[36] Mnmemosphere project website: https://www.mnemosphere.polimi.it/
[37] A. Caccia et al., Educazione e memoria. Un racconto di periferia. 2021. Project funded by MIUR (Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research).