Creating a Profound Sense of Comfort to Stimulate Workers’ Innovation and Productivity: Exploring Research and Case Study Applications
Purpose: The aim of this research is to explore and discuss innovation-workspaces, and how the design of the workspace has the potential to boost the work process and encourage employees’ satisfaction, leading to inventive and creative results. Background: The relationship between the workers and the work environment has a strong potential to enhance work outcomes when optimized for work goals. Innovation-work environment can benefit employees’ satisfaction, health, and performance. To understand this complex relationship, this research explores innovation-work environments. Methods: A review of 26 peer-reviewed articles, seven books, and 23 companies’ websites was conducted; in addition, five case studies were analyzed to deduce appropriate examples for the study. Results: The research found all successful five innovation environments focused on two aspects: first, workers’ satisfaction and comfort, which includes a focus on physical, functional, and psychological comfort; second aspect, all five centers were diverse work environments that addressed workers’ needs, design for individuals and teamwork, design for workers’ freedom, and design for increasing interaction. Conclusion: understanding individuals' needs and creating work environments that enhance interaction between workers and with the space are key aspects of successful innovation-work environments.
[1] P. Roelofsen, “The impact of office environments on employee performance: The design of the workplace as a strategy for productivity enhancement”. Journal of facilities Management, 2002.
[2] J. Veitch, K. Charles, K. Farley, and G. Newsham, “A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 27, no.3, pp.177–189, 2007
[3] J. Wagner, and D. Watch, “Innovation spaces: The new design of work.” brookings institution, April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.1996.564589
[4] N. Kamarulzaman, A. Saleh, S. Hashim, H. Hashim, and A. Abdul-Ghani, “An overview of the influence of physical office environments towards employee”. Procedia Engineering, vol. 20, 262–268, 2011.
[5] N. Oseland, “The impact of psychological needs on office design.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 11 no. 4, 244–254. Nov 20, 2009.
[6] K. Chandrasekar, “Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizations.” International journal of enterprise computing and business systems, vol. 1, no. 1, 1–19, 2011.
[7] J. C. Vischer, “Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work.” Architectural Science Review, vol. 51, no. 2, 97–108, 2008.
[8] G. Llopis, “Job titles disrupt productivity and innovation.” (2015, September 15). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/glennllopis/2015/09/15/job-titles-disrupt-productivity-and-innovation/#7cf73c227486
[9] D. Stegmeier, “Innovations in office design: The critical influence approach to effective work environments.” John Wiley & Sons. 2008.
[10] N.D. “Bosch officially opens new research campus in Renningen.” Torque. 2015. Retrieved from http://news.cision.com/torque/r/bosch-officially-opens-new-research-campus-in-renningen,c9848937
[11] A. Wade, “Stuttgart via Stanford: Inside Bosch's new R&D campus.” May 06, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.theengineer.co.uk/stuttgart-via-stanford-inside-boschs-new-rd-campus/
[12] V. Magnago Lampugnani, J. and Burckhardt, “Novartis campus: A contemporary work environment premises, elements, perspectives.” Hatje Cantz, 2008.
[13] E. Martins, and N. Martins, “An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation.” SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, vol. 28, no. 4, 58–65, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v28i4.71
[14] D. Kreuscher, “Global coworking survey: coworking as a corporate trend.” October 27, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.smartworkers.net/2017/10/coworking-als-unternehmenstrend/
[15] “Bosch starts construction of new center for research and advance engineering in Renningen,” Germany. BOSCH. 2012. Retrieved from https://www.bosch-presse.de/pressportal/de/en/bosch-starts-construction-of-new-center-for-research-and-advance-engineering-in-renningen-germany-41793.html
[16] M. Saint Paul, “Research & Development Building.” BWBR. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bwbr.com/portfolio/research-development-building/
[17] F. Jossi, “Progress MN: 3M Co. Finance-Commerce.” April 11, 2014,). Retrieved from https://finance-commerce.com/2014/04/progress-mn-3m-co/
[18] “Ri.MED biomedical research and biotechnology center.”HOK. 2010. Retrieved from https://www.arthitectural.com/hok-ri-med-biomedical-research-and-biotechnology-center/
[19] “HOK's design of ri.med's new biomedical research hub in Italy.” HOK Network. December 12,2012. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONrRFL33Ew0
[20] “Novartis Campus Pilot Project.” Sevil Peach. 2019. Retrieved from http://www.sevilpeach.co.uk/project/novartis-pilot
[21] J. Meachem, “Googleplex: A New campus community.” 2019. Retrieved from https://clivewilkinson.com/case-studies-googleplex-a-new-campus-community/
[22] “The Art of Wimmel Research.” Schloss-Post. April 30, 2018. Retrieved from https://schloss-post.com/the-art-of-wimmelresearch
[1] P. Roelofsen, “The impact of office environments on employee performance: The design of the workplace as a strategy for productivity enhancement”. Journal of facilities Management, 2002.
[2] J. Veitch, K. Charles, K. Farley, and G. Newsham, “A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings”. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 27, no.3, pp.177–189, 2007
[3] J. Wagner, and D. Watch, “Innovation spaces: The new design of work.” brookings institution, April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.1996.564589
[4] N. Kamarulzaman, A. Saleh, S. Hashim, H. Hashim, and A. Abdul-Ghani, “An overview of the influence of physical office environments towards employee”. Procedia Engineering, vol. 20, 262–268, 2011.
[5] N. Oseland, “The impact of psychological needs on office design.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 11 no. 4, 244–254. Nov 20, 2009.
[6] K. Chandrasekar, “Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizations.” International journal of enterprise computing and business systems, vol. 1, no. 1, 1–19, 2011.
[7] J. C. Vischer, “Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work.” Architectural Science Review, vol. 51, no. 2, 97–108, 2008.
[8] G. Llopis, “Job titles disrupt productivity and innovation.” (2015, September 15). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/glennllopis/2015/09/15/job-titles-disrupt-productivity-and-innovation/#7cf73c227486
[9] D. Stegmeier, “Innovations in office design: The critical influence approach to effective work environments.” John Wiley & Sons. 2008.
[10] N.D. “Bosch officially opens new research campus in Renningen.” Torque. 2015. Retrieved from http://news.cision.com/torque/r/bosch-officially-opens-new-research-campus-in-renningen,c9848937
[11] A. Wade, “Stuttgart via Stanford: Inside Bosch's new R&D campus.” May 06, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.theengineer.co.uk/stuttgart-via-stanford-inside-boschs-new-rd-campus/
[12] V. Magnago Lampugnani, J. and Burckhardt, “Novartis campus: A contemporary work environment premises, elements, perspectives.” Hatje Cantz, 2008.
[13] E. Martins, and N. Martins, “An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation.” SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, vol. 28, no. 4, 58–65, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v28i4.71
[14] D. Kreuscher, “Global coworking survey: coworking as a corporate trend.” October 27, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.smartworkers.net/2017/10/coworking-als-unternehmenstrend/
[15] “Bosch starts construction of new center for research and advance engineering in Renningen,” Germany. BOSCH. 2012. Retrieved from https://www.bosch-presse.de/pressportal/de/en/bosch-starts-construction-of-new-center-for-research-and-advance-engineering-in-renningen-germany-41793.html
[16] M. Saint Paul, “Research & Development Building.” BWBR. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bwbr.com/portfolio/research-development-building/
[17] F. Jossi, “Progress MN: 3M Co. Finance-Commerce.” April 11, 2014,). Retrieved from https://finance-commerce.com/2014/04/progress-mn-3m-co/
[18] “Ri.MED biomedical research and biotechnology center.”HOK. 2010. Retrieved from https://www.arthitectural.com/hok-ri-med-biomedical-research-and-biotechnology-center/
[19] “HOK's design of ri.med's new biomedical research hub in Italy.” HOK Network. December 12,2012. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONrRFL33Ew0
[20] “Novartis Campus Pilot Project.” Sevil Peach. 2019. Retrieved from http://www.sevilpeach.co.uk/project/novartis-pilot
[21] J. Meachem, “Googleplex: A New campus community.” 2019. Retrieved from https://clivewilkinson.com/case-studies-googleplex-a-new-campus-community/
[22] “The Art of Wimmel Research.” Schloss-Post. April 30, 2018. Retrieved from https://schloss-post.com/the-art-of-wimmelresearch
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:80766", author = "Rana Bazaid and Debajyoti Pati", title = "Creating a Profound Sense of Comfort to Stimulate Workers’ Innovation and Productivity: Exploring Research and Case Study Applications", abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this research is to explore and discuss innovation-workspaces, and how the design of the workspace has the potential to boost the work process and encourage employees’ satisfaction, leading to inventive and creative results. Background: The relationship between the workers and the work environment has a strong potential to enhance work outcomes when optimized for work goals. Innovation-work environment can benefit employees’ satisfaction, health, and performance. To understand this complex relationship, this research explores innovation-work environments. Methods: A review of 26 peer-reviewed articles, seven books, and 23 companies’ websites was conducted; in addition, five case studies were analyzed to deduce appropriate examples for the study. Results: The research found all successful five innovation environments focused on two aspects: first, workers’ satisfaction and comfort, which includes a focus on physical, functional, and psychological comfort; second aspect, all five centers were diverse work environments that addressed workers’ needs, design for individuals and teamwork, design for workers’ freedom, and design for increasing interaction. Conclusion: understanding individuals' needs and creating work environments that enhance interaction between workers and with the space are key aspects of successful innovation-work environments. ", keywords = "Innovation-workspace, productivity, work environment, workers’ satisfaction.", volume = "16", number = "4", pages = "199-7", }
