Corrosion Evaluation of Zinc Coating Prepared by Two Types of Electric Currents

In this research, zinc coatings were fabricated by electroplating process in a sulfate solution under direct and pulse current conditions. In direct and pulse current conditions, effect of maximum current was investigated on the coating properties. Also a comparison was made between the obtained coatings under direct and pulse current. Morphology of the coatings was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Corrosion behavior of the coatings was investigated by potentiodynamic polarization test. In pulse current conditions, the effect of pulse frequency and duty cycle was also studied. The effect of these conditions and parameters were also investigated on morphology and corrosion behavior. All of DC plated coatings are showing a distinct passivation area in -1 to -0.4 V range. Pulsed current coatings possessed a higher corrosion resistance. The results showed that current density is the most important factor regarding the fabrication process. Furthermore, a rise in duty cycle deteriorated corrosion resistance of coatings. Pulsed plated coatings performed almost 10 times better than DC plated coatings.





References:
[1] T. J. Tuaweri and G. D. Wilcox, “Behaviour of Zn-SiO2 electrodeposition in the presence of N, N-dimethyldodecylamine,” Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 200, no. 20–21, pp. 5921–5930, 2006.
[2] F. C. Porter, Corrosion resistance of zinc and zinc alloys. CRC Press, 1994.
[3] J. Steinbach and H. Ferkel, “Nanostructured Ni-Al2O3 films prepared by DC and pulsed DC electroplating,” Scr. Mater., vol. 8, no. 44, pp. 1813–1816, 2001.
[4] M. E. Bahrololoom and R. Sani, “The influence of pulse plating parameters on the hardness and wear resistance of nickel–alumina composite coatings,” Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 192, no. 2–3, pp. 154–163, 2005.
[5] M. Sajjadnejad, M. Ghorbani, and A. Afshar, “Microstructure-corrosion resistance relationship of direct and pulse current electrodeposited Zn-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings,” Ceram. Int., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 217–224, 2015.
[6] M. Sajjadnejad, N. Setoudeh, A. Mozafari, A. Isazadeh, and H. Omidvar, “Alkaline Electrodeposition of Ni–ZnO Nanocomposite Coatings: Effects of Pulse Electroplating Parameters,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1533–1541, 2017.
[7] M. Sajjadnejad, A. Mozafari, H. Omidvar, and M. Javanbakht, “Preparation and corrosion resistance of pulse electrodeposited Zn and Zn–SiC nanocomposite coatings,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 300, pp. 1–7, 2014.
[8] C. J. Chen and C. C. Wan, “A study of the current efficiency decrease accompanying short pulse time for pulse plating,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 136, no. 10, pp. 2850–2855, 1989.
[9] Y. Yang and Y. F. Cheng, “Fabrication of Ni–Co–SiC composite coatings by pulse electrodeposition—Effects of duty cycle and pulse frequency,” Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 216, pp. 282–288, 2013.
[10] A. K. Pradhan and S. Das, “Pulse-reverse electrodeposition of Cu–SiC nanocomposite coating: effect of concentration of SiC in the electrolyte,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 590, pp. 294–302, 2014.
[11] M. Sajjadnejad, H. Omidvar, M. Javanbakht, and A. Mozafari, “Textural and structural evolution of pulse electrodeposited Ni/diamond nanocomposite coatings,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 704, pp. 809–817, 2017.
[12] P. C. Tulio and I. A. Carlos, “Effect of SiC and Al 2 O 3 particles on the electrodeposition of Zn, Co and ZnCo: II. Electrodeposition in the presence of SiC and Al 2 O 3 and production of ZnCo–SiC and ZnCo–Al 2 O 3 coatings,” J. Appl. Electrochem., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1305–1311, 2009.
[13] G. Roventi, T. Bellezze, and R. Fratesi, “Electrodeposition of Zn–SiC nanocomposite coatings,” J. Appl. Electrochem., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 839–846, 2013.
[14] T. Frade, V. Bouzon, A. Gomes, and M. I. da Silva Pereira, “Pulsed-reverse current electrodeposition of Zn and Zn-TiO2 nanocomposite films,” Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 204, no. 21–22, pp. 3592–3598, 2010.
[15] I. Suzuki, “The behavior of corrosion products on zinc in sodium chloride solution,” Corros. Sci., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1029–1034, 1985.