Catalytic Gasification of Olive Mill Wastewater as a Biomass Source under Supercritical Conditions

Recently, a growing interest has emerged on the development of new and efficient energy sources, due to the inevitable extinction of the nonrenewable energy reserves. One of these alternative sources which have a great potential and sustainability to meet up the energy demand is biomass energy. This significant energy source can be utilized with various energy conversion technologies, one of which is biomass gasification in supercritical water.

Water, being the most important solvent in nature, has very important characteristics as a reaction solvent under supercritical circumstances. At temperatures above its critical point (374.8^oC and 22.1MPa), water becomes more acidic and its diffusivity increases. Working with water at high temperatures increases the thermal reaction rate, which in consequence leads to a better dissolving of the organic matters and a fast reaction with oxygen. Hence, supercritical water offers a control mechanism depending on solubility, excellent transport properties based on its high diffusion ability and new reaction possibilities for hydrolysis or oxidation.

In this study the gasification of a real biomass, namely olive mill wastewater (OMW), in supercritical water conditions is investigated with the use of Ru/Al₂O₃ catalyst. OMW is a by-product obtained during olive oil production, which has a complex nature characterized by a high content of organic compounds and polyphenols. These properties impose OMW a significant pollution potential, but at the same time, the high content of organics makes OMW a desirable biomass candidate for energy production.

The catalytic gasification experiments were made with five different reaction temperatures (400, 450, 500, 550 and 600°C) and five reaction times (30, 60, 90, 120 and 150s), under a constant pressure of 25MPa. Through these experiments, the effects of reaction temperature and time on the gasification yield, gaseous product composition and OMW treatment efficiency were investigated.

• Ekin Kıpçak
• Mesut Akgün

• Catalyst
• Gasification
• Olive mill wastewater
• Ru/Al2O3
• Supercritical water.

[1] E. Kıpçak, O. O. Söğüt, and M. Akgün, “Hydrothermal gasification of
olive mill wastewater as a biomass source in supercritical water”,
Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Vol. 57, pp. 50-57, 2011.
[2] J. Yanik, E. Ebale, A. Kruse, M. Saglam, and M. Yuksel, “Biomass
gasification in supercritical water: Part 1. Effect of the nature of the
biomass”, Fuel, Vol. 86, pp. 2410-2415, 2007.
[3] P. D’Jesus, N. Boukis, B. Kraushaar-Czarnetzki, and E. Dinjus,
“Gasification of corn and clover grass in supercritical water”, Fuel, Vol.
85, pp. 1032-1038, 2006.
[4] S. Wang, Y. Guo, L. Wang, Y. Wang, D. Xu, and H. Ma, “Supercritical
water oxidation of coal: Investigation of operating parameters’ effects,
reaction kinetics and mechanism”, Fuel Proc. Tech., Vol. 92, pp. 291-
297, 2011.
[5] A.A. Vostrikov, O.N. Fedyaeva, D.Y. Dubov, S.A. Psarov, and M.Y.
Sokol, “Conversion of brown coal in supercritical water without and
with addition of oxygen at continuous supply of coal-water slurry”,
Energy, Vol. 36, pp. 1948-1955, 2011.
[6] N. Akiya and P. E. Savage, “Roles of water for chemical reactions in
high-temperature water”, Chem. Rev. Vol. 102, pp. 2725-2750, 2002.
[7] G. Brunner, “Near critical and supercritical water. Part I. Hydrolytic and
hydrothermal processes”, J. Supercrit. Fluids, Vol. 47, pp. 373–381,
2009.
[8] A. Kruse, and E. Dinjus, “Hot compressed water as reaction medium
and reactant: 2. Degradation reactions”, J. Supercrit. Fluids, Vol. 41,
pp. 361–379, 2007.
[9] H. Erkonak, O. O. Söğüt, and M. Akgün, “Treatment of olive mill
wastewater by supercritical water oxidation”, J. Supercrit. Fluids, Vol.
46, pp. 142-148, 2008.
[10] D. Klingler and H. Vogel, “Influence of process parameters on the
oxidative decomposition and oxidation of glucose in sub- and
supercritical water”, J. Supercrit. Fluids, Vol. 55, pp. 259-270, 2010.
[11] P. T. Williams and J. Onwudili, “Subcritical and supercritical water
gasification of cellulose, starch, glucose, and biomass waste”, Energy &
Fuels, Vol. 20, pp. 1259-1265, 2006.
[12] F. Raposo, R. Borja, E. Sanchez, M. A. Martin, and A. Martin,
“Performance and kinetic evaluation of the anaerobic digestion of twophase
olive mill effluents in reactors with suspended immobilized
biomass”, Water Research, Vol. 38, pp. 2017-2026, 2004.
[13] R. Borja, B. Rincon, and F. Raposo, “Review: Anaerobic
biodegradation of two-phase olive mill solid wastes and liquid effluents:
kinetic studies and process performance”, J Chem Technol Biotechnol,
Vol. 81, pp. 1450-1462, 2006.