Applicability of Diatom-Based Water Quality Assessment Indices in Dari Stream, Isparta- Turkey
Diatoms are an important group of aquatic ecosystems and diatom-based indices are increasingly becoming important tools for the assessment of ecological conditions in lotic systems. Although the studies are very limited about Turkish rivers, diatom indices were used for monitoring rivers in different basins. In the present study, we used OMNIDIA program for estimation of stream quality. Some indices have less sensitive (IDP, WAT, LOBO, GENRE, TID, CEE, PT), intermediate sensitivities (IDSE, DESCY, IPS, DI-CH, SLA, IDAP), the others higher sensitivities (SID, IBD, SHE, EPI-D). Among the investigated diatom communities, only a few taxa indicated alfa-mesosaprobity and polysaprobity. Most of the sites were characterized by a great relative contribution of eutraphent and tolerant ones as well as oligosaprobic and betamesosaprobic diatoms. In general, SID and IBD indices gave the best results. This study suggests that the structure of benthic diatom communities and diatom indices, especially SID, can be applied for monitoring rivers in Southern Turkey.
<p>[1] Salomoni SE., Rocha O., Callegaro VL & Lobo EA. (2006). Epilithic
diatoms as indicators of water quality in the Gravataı´ river, Rio Grande
do Sul, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 559: 233–246.
[2] Dixit SS., Dixit AS & Smol JP. (1992). Assessment of changes in lake
water chemistry in Sudbury area lakes since preindustrial times. Can. J.
Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49(Suppl. 1):8–16.
[3] Rimet F. (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms.
Hydrobiologia, 683:1–24.
[4] Descy JP & Coste M (1991). A test of methods for assessing water
quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen der Internationalen
Vereinigung fu¨r Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 24: 2112–
2116.
[5] Kelly, MG. & Whitton, BA. (1995). The trophic diatom index: a new
index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied
Phycology 7: 433–444.
[6] Prygiel J., Whitton BA & Bukowska J. (1999). Use of Algae for
Monitoring Rivers III. Agence de L’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai: 271 pp.
[7] Zelinka M. & Marvan P. (1961). Zur prasisiering der biologischen
klassifikation der reinheot fliessender gewa¨sser. Archive Hydrobiologia
57: 389–407.
[8] Stevenson RJ., Pan Y. (1999). Assessing environmental conditions in
rivers and streams with diatoms. In: The Diatoms. Applications for the
Environmental and Earth Sciences (Eds: EF STOERMER & JP SMOL).
- pp. 11-40 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[9] Stevenson RJ., Pan Y. (1999). Assessing environmental conditions in
rivers and streams with diatoms. In: The Diatoms. Applications for the
Environmental and Earth Sciences (Eds: EF STOERMER & JP SMOL).
- pp. 11-40 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[10] Eloranta P., Soininen J. (2002). Ecological Status of some Finnish rivers
evaluated using diatom communities, Journal of Applied Phycology 14,
1-7.
[11] Rimet F., Cauchie HM., Hoffmann L & Ector L. (2005). Response of
diatom indices to simulated water quality improvements in a river.
Journal of Applied Phycology 17: 119–128.
[12] Harding WR., Archibald CGM & Taylor JC. (2005). The relevance of
diatoms for water quality assessment in South Africa: a position paper.
Water SA 31: 41–46.
[13] Kalyoncu H., Barlas M. (1997). Isparta Deresinde Yoğun Olarak
Belirlenen Epilitik Diatomların Su Kalitesine Bağlı Olarak Mevsimsel
Değisimleri. IX. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyum Kitabı, 17-19 Eylül
1997. Eğirdir/Isparta. 310-324.
[14] Kalyoncu H., Barlas M., Ertan OÖ., Gülboy H. (2004). Ağlasun
Deresi'nin Su Kalitesinin Fizikokimyasal Parametrelere ve Epilitik
Alglere Göre Belirlenmesi. Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(7):
7-14.
[15] Solak CN & Ács É (2011). Water qualıty monıtorıng ın European and
Turkısh rıvers usıng dıatoms. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences 11(2): 329-337.
[16] Solak CN, Ector L., Wojtal AZ., Ács É. & Morales EA (2012). A review
of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkish inland waters.
Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 141: 431-462.
[17] Kalyoncu H. (2006). Isparta Deresi Su kalitesinin Fizikokimyasal
Parametrelere ve Epilitik Diyatomelere Göre Belirlenmesi. SDU Fen
Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi (E-Dergi),1(1): 14-25.
[18] Kalyoncu H., Barlas M., Ertan Ö.O. (2009c). Aksu Çayı'nın Su
Kalitesinin Biotik Đndekslere (Diyatomlara ve Omurgasızlara Göre) ve
Fizikokimyasal Parametrelere Göre Đncelenmesi, Organizmaların Su
Kalitesi ile Đliskileri. Türk Bilim Dergisi, 2(1): 46-57.
[19] Gürbüz H, Kıvrak E (2002). Use of epilithic diatoms to evaluate water
quality in the Karasu River of Turkey. J Environ Biol. 23(3):239-46.
[20] Solak CN., Fehér G., Barlas M and Pabuçcu K. (2007). Use of epilithic
diatoms to evaluate water quality of Akçay Stream (Büyük Menderes
River) in Mugla/Turkey. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie Suppl., 161 (3-4),
Large Rivers, 17(3-4): 327-338.
[21] Kalyoncu, H., Çiçek, N. L., Akköz, C and Yorulmaz, B. (2009b).
Comparative performance of diatom indices in aquatic pollution
assesment. African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 4 (10), pp.
1032-1040.
[22] Solak CN., Barinova S., Acs E & Dayıoğlu H. (2012a). Diversity and
ecology of diatoms from Felent Creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey.
Turk J Bot, 36.
[23] American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998). Standard methods
for examination of water and wastewater. Washington, D.C.: American
Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation.
[24] Round FE., 1991. Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. Journal of
Applied Phycology 3: 129–145.
[25] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1986) Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil:
Naviculaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band
2-1, Stuttgart.
[26] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1988) Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil:
Bacillariophyceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Süßwasser von
mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-2, Stuttgart.
[27] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991a) Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil:
Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa.
Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-3, Stuttgart.
[28] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991b) Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil:
Achnantheceae, Kritische Erg舅zungen zu Navicula (Lincolatae) und
Gomphonema. Cesamptliteraturverzeichnis . Süßwasser von
mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-4, Stuttgart.
[29] Round FE., Crawford RM and Mann DG. (1990). The diatoms: biology
and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press: London,
UK., 747 pp.
[30] Hartley B., Barber HG., Carter JR & Sims PA. (1996). An atlas of British
Diatoms. Biopress Limited, Bristol.
[31] Lecointe C., Coste M & Prygiel J (1993). ‘‘Omnidia’’: software for
taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management.
Hydrobiology 269 (270): 509–513.
[32] SPSS INC (2004). SPSS Proffessional Statistics 13.0 SPSSINC,Chicago.
[33] Sonneman JA., Walsh CJ., Breen PF & Sharpe AK. (2001). Effects of
urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. II.
Benthic diatom communities. Freshwater Biology 46: 553–565.
[34] Lobo EA., Katoh K & Aruga Y. (1995). Response of epilithic diatom
assemblages to water pollution in rivers in the Tokyo Metropolitan area.
Freshwater Biol., 34:191-204.
[35] Lange-Bertalot H. (1978). Diatomeen-Differantiallortenanstelle von
Leitformen: ein geeigneteres Kriterium der Gewässerbelastung. Arch,
Hydrobiol. Suppl. 51. Algological Studies 21. 393-427 pp. Suttutgard.
[36] Lange-Bertalot H. (1979a). Pollution tolerance of diatoms as acriterion
for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 64: 285–304.
[37] Cox EJ. (1996). Identification of Freshwater Diatoms From Live
Material. Chapman & Hall, London, 158 pp.
[38] Biggs BJF & Kilroy C. (2000). Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual.
NIWA, Christchurch, New Zealand.
[39] Potapova M & Charles DF. (2003). Distribution of benthic diatoms in
U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater
Biology 48: 1311–1328.
[40] Duong T., Coste M., Feurtet-mazel A., Dang D., Gold, C., Park, Y.
(2006). Impact of urban pollution from the Hanoi area on benthic diatom
communities collected from the Red, Nhue and Tolich Rivers (Vietnam).
Hydrobiologia 563:201–216.
[41] Bere T., Tundisi JG. (2011a). Applicability of borrowed diatom-based
water quality assessment indices in streams around Sa˜o Carlos-SP,
Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 673:79–192.
[42] Lobo EA., Callegaro, VL., Hermany G., Bes D., Wetzel CE & Oliveira
MA. (2004). Use of epilithic diatoms as bioindicator from lotic systems
in southern Brazil, with special emphasis on eutrophication. Acta
Limnologica Brasiliensia 16: 25–40.
[43] Lobo EA., Callegaro VL & Bender P. (2002). Utilizac¸a˜o de algas
diatoma´ceas epilı´ticas como indicadoras da qualidade da a´gua em
rios e arroios da Regia˜o Hidrogra´fica do Guaı´ba, RS. EDUNISC,
Santa Cruz do Sul, Brasil.
[44] Kobayasi H. & Mayama S. (1989). Most pollution-tolerant diatoms of
severely polluted rivers in the vicinity of Tokyo. Japanese Journal of
Phycology 30: 188–196.
[45] Lobo EA., Callegaro VLM, Oliveira MA, Salomoni SE., Schuler S &
Asai K. (1996). Pollution tolerant diatoms from lotic systems in the
Jacui Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Se´rie Botaˆnica 47:
45–72.
[46] Cholnoky BJ (1970) Bacillariophyceae from the Bangweulu Swamps.
Cercle Hydrobiologique de Bruxelles, Brussels.
[47] Klee, O. (1991). Angewandte Hydrobiologie. G. Theieme Verlag, 2.
neubearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Stuttgart-New York, 272 pp.
[48] Steinberg C. and Schiefele S. (1988). Biological indication of trophy and
pollution of running waters. 2. Wasser – Abwasser – Frosch., 21: 227-
234.
[49] Barlas M. (1988). Limnologische untersuchungen ander Fulda unter
besonderer berücksichtigung der fischparasiten, Ihrer Wirtsspektren und
der Wassergüte. Dissertation. PhD Thesis. Üniversität Kassel.
[50] Van Dam H., Mertens A & Sinkeldam J. (1994). A coded checklist and
ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands.
Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133.
[51] Prygiel J., Coste M (1993) The assessment of water quality in the Artois-
Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiol.
269/279 343-349.
[52] Kelly, M. G., C. J. Penny, B. A. Whitton., 1995.Comparative
performance of benthic diatom indicesused to assess river water quality.
Hydrobiologia 302:179–188.
[53] Rakowska B., Szczepocka E. 2011. Demonstration of the Bzura River
restoration using diatom indices. Biologia 66(3): 411–417.
[54] Kwandrans J., Eloranta P., Kawecka B & Kryzsysztof W. (1998). Use of
benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of
southern Poland. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 193–201,
[55] Bere T & Tundisi JG. (2011b). Influence of land-use patterns on benthic
diatom communities and water quality in the tropical Monjolinho
hydrological basin, Sa˜o Carlos-SP, Brazil. Water SA 37: 93–102.
[56] Bella DV., Puccinelli C., Marcheggiani S., Mancini L. (2007). Benthic
diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in
wetlands of central Italy. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43 (2), 89-99.
[57] Vilbaste, S., Truu, J., Leisk, Ü. & Iital, A. 2007. Species composition
and diatom indices in relation to environmental parameters in Estonian
streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161(3.4), 307.326.
[58] Rott, E., Pipp, E. and Pfister, P., 2003. Diatom methods developed for
river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical
trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algological studies, 110: 91–
115.
[59] Watanabe T., Asai K & Houki A. (1986). Numerical estimation of
organic pollution of flowing waters by using the epilithic diatom
assemblage – Diatom Assemblage Index (DIApo). Science of the Total
Environment 55: 209–218.
[60] Dell’Uomo A. (1996). Assessment of water quality of an Apennine river
as a pilot study. In Whitton, B. A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for
Monitoring Rivers II. Institut fu¨r Botanik, Universita¨t Innsbruck,
Innsbruck: 65–73.
[61] Go´mez N. & Licursi M. (2001). The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for
assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology 35: 173–
181.
[62] Walley WJ., Grbovic J & Eroski , S. (2001). A Reappraisal Of Saprobic
Values And Indicator Weights Based On Slovenian River Quality Data.
Wat. Res. Vol. 35, No. 18, Pp. 4285–4292.</p>
<p>[1] Salomoni SE., Rocha O., Callegaro VL & Lobo EA. (2006). Epilithic
diatoms as indicators of water quality in the Gravataı´ river, Rio Grande
do Sul, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 559: 233–246.
[2] Dixit SS., Dixit AS & Smol JP. (1992). Assessment of changes in lake
water chemistry in Sudbury area lakes since preindustrial times. Can. J.
Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49(Suppl. 1):8–16.
[3] Rimet F. (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms.
Hydrobiologia, 683:1–24.
[4] Descy JP & Coste M (1991). A test of methods for assessing water
quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen der Internationalen
Vereinigung fu¨r Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 24: 2112–
2116.
[5] Kelly, MG. & Whitton, BA. (1995). The trophic diatom index: a new
index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied
Phycology 7: 433–444.
[6] Prygiel J., Whitton BA & Bukowska J. (1999). Use of Algae for
Monitoring Rivers III. Agence de L’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai: 271 pp.
[7] Zelinka M. & Marvan P. (1961). Zur prasisiering der biologischen
klassifikation der reinheot fliessender gewa¨sser. Archive Hydrobiologia
57: 389–407.
[8] Stevenson RJ., Pan Y. (1999). Assessing environmental conditions in
rivers and streams with diatoms. In: The Diatoms. Applications for the
Environmental and Earth Sciences (Eds: EF STOERMER & JP SMOL).
- pp. 11-40 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[9] Stevenson RJ., Pan Y. (1999). Assessing environmental conditions in
rivers and streams with diatoms. In: The Diatoms. Applications for the
Environmental and Earth Sciences (Eds: EF STOERMER & JP SMOL).
- pp. 11-40 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[10] Eloranta P., Soininen J. (2002). Ecological Status of some Finnish rivers
evaluated using diatom communities, Journal of Applied Phycology 14,
1-7.
[11] Rimet F., Cauchie HM., Hoffmann L & Ector L. (2005). Response of
diatom indices to simulated water quality improvements in a river.
Journal of Applied Phycology 17: 119–128.
[12] Harding WR., Archibald CGM & Taylor JC. (2005). The relevance of
diatoms for water quality assessment in South Africa: a position paper.
Water SA 31: 41–46.
[13] Kalyoncu H., Barlas M. (1997). Isparta Deresinde Yoğun Olarak
Belirlenen Epilitik Diatomların Su Kalitesine Bağlı Olarak Mevsimsel
Değisimleri. IX. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyum Kitabı, 17-19 Eylül
1997. Eğirdir/Isparta. 310-324.
[14] Kalyoncu H., Barlas M., Ertan OÖ., Gülboy H. (2004). Ağlasun
Deresi'nin Su Kalitesinin Fizikokimyasal Parametrelere ve Epilitik
Alglere Göre Belirlenmesi. Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(7):
7-14.
[15] Solak CN & Ács É (2011). Water qualıty monıtorıng ın European and
Turkısh rıvers usıng dıatoms. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences 11(2): 329-337.
[16] Solak CN, Ector L., Wojtal AZ., Ács É. & Morales EA (2012). A review
of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkish inland waters.
Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 141: 431-462.
[17] Kalyoncu H. (2006). Isparta Deresi Su kalitesinin Fizikokimyasal
Parametrelere ve Epilitik Diyatomelere Göre Belirlenmesi. SDU Fen
Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi (E-Dergi),1(1): 14-25.
[18] Kalyoncu H., Barlas M., Ertan Ö.O. (2009c). Aksu Çayı'nın Su
Kalitesinin Biotik Đndekslere (Diyatomlara ve Omurgasızlara Göre) ve
Fizikokimyasal Parametrelere Göre Đncelenmesi, Organizmaların Su
Kalitesi ile Đliskileri. Türk Bilim Dergisi, 2(1): 46-57.
[19] Gürbüz H, Kıvrak E (2002). Use of epilithic diatoms to evaluate water
quality in the Karasu River of Turkey. J Environ Biol. 23(3):239-46.
[20] Solak CN., Fehér G., Barlas M and Pabuçcu K. (2007). Use of epilithic
diatoms to evaluate water quality of Akçay Stream (Büyük Menderes
River) in Mugla/Turkey. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie Suppl., 161 (3-4),
Large Rivers, 17(3-4): 327-338.
[21] Kalyoncu, H., Çiçek, N. L., Akköz, C and Yorulmaz, B. (2009b).
Comparative performance of diatom indices in aquatic pollution
assesment. African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 4 (10), pp.
1032-1040.
[22] Solak CN., Barinova S., Acs E & Dayıoğlu H. (2012a). Diversity and
ecology of diatoms from Felent Creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey.
Turk J Bot, 36.
[23] American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998). Standard methods
for examination of water and wastewater. Washington, D.C.: American
Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation.
[24] Round FE., 1991. Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. Journal of
Applied Phycology 3: 129–145.
[25] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1986) Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil:
Naviculaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band
2-1, Stuttgart.
[26] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1988) Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil:
Bacillariophyceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Süßwasser von
mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-2, Stuttgart.
[27] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991a) Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil:
Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa.
Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-3, Stuttgart.
[28] Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991b) Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil:
Achnantheceae, Kritische Erg舅zungen zu Navicula (Lincolatae) und
Gomphonema. Cesamptliteraturverzeichnis . Süßwasser von
mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-4, Stuttgart.
[29] Round FE., Crawford RM and Mann DG. (1990). The diatoms: biology
and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press: London,
UK., 747 pp.
[30] Hartley B., Barber HG., Carter JR & Sims PA. (1996). An atlas of British
Diatoms. Biopress Limited, Bristol.
[31] Lecointe C., Coste M & Prygiel J (1993). ‘‘Omnidia’’: software for
taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management.
Hydrobiology 269 (270): 509–513.
[32] SPSS INC (2004). SPSS Proffessional Statistics 13.0 SPSSINC,Chicago.
[33] Sonneman JA., Walsh CJ., Breen PF & Sharpe AK. (2001). Effects of
urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. II.
Benthic diatom communities. Freshwater Biology 46: 553–565.
[34] Lobo EA., Katoh K & Aruga Y. (1995). Response of epilithic diatom
assemblages to water pollution in rivers in the Tokyo Metropolitan area.
Freshwater Biol., 34:191-204.
[35] Lange-Bertalot H. (1978). Diatomeen-Differantiallortenanstelle von
Leitformen: ein geeigneteres Kriterium der Gewässerbelastung. Arch,
Hydrobiol. Suppl. 51. Algological Studies 21. 393-427 pp. Suttutgard.
[36] Lange-Bertalot H. (1979a). Pollution tolerance of diatoms as acriterion
for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 64: 285–304.
[37] Cox EJ. (1996). Identification of Freshwater Diatoms From Live
Material. Chapman & Hall, London, 158 pp.
[38] Biggs BJF & Kilroy C. (2000). Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual.
NIWA, Christchurch, New Zealand.
[39] Potapova M & Charles DF. (2003). Distribution of benthic diatoms in
U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater
Biology 48: 1311–1328.
[40] Duong T., Coste M., Feurtet-mazel A., Dang D., Gold, C., Park, Y.
(2006). Impact of urban pollution from the Hanoi area on benthic diatom
communities collected from the Red, Nhue and Tolich Rivers (Vietnam).
Hydrobiologia 563:201–216.
[41] Bere T., Tundisi JG. (2011a). Applicability of borrowed diatom-based
water quality assessment indices in streams around Sa˜o Carlos-SP,
Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 673:79–192.
[42] Lobo EA., Callegaro, VL., Hermany G., Bes D., Wetzel CE & Oliveira
MA. (2004). Use of epilithic diatoms as bioindicator from lotic systems
in southern Brazil, with special emphasis on eutrophication. Acta
Limnologica Brasiliensia 16: 25–40.
[43] Lobo EA., Callegaro VL & Bender P. (2002). Utilizac¸a˜o de algas
diatoma´ceas epilı´ticas como indicadoras da qualidade da a´gua em
rios e arroios da Regia˜o Hidrogra´fica do Guaı´ba, RS. EDUNISC,
Santa Cruz do Sul, Brasil.
[44] Kobayasi H. & Mayama S. (1989). Most pollution-tolerant diatoms of
severely polluted rivers in the vicinity of Tokyo. Japanese Journal of
Phycology 30: 188–196.
[45] Lobo EA., Callegaro VLM, Oliveira MA, Salomoni SE., Schuler S &
Asai K. (1996). Pollution tolerant diatoms from lotic systems in the
Jacui Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Se´rie Botaˆnica 47:
45–72.
[46] Cholnoky BJ (1970) Bacillariophyceae from the Bangweulu Swamps.
Cercle Hydrobiologique de Bruxelles, Brussels.
[47] Klee, O. (1991). Angewandte Hydrobiologie. G. Theieme Verlag, 2.
neubearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Stuttgart-New York, 272 pp.
[48] Steinberg C. and Schiefele S. (1988). Biological indication of trophy and
pollution of running waters. 2. Wasser – Abwasser – Frosch., 21: 227-
234.
[49] Barlas M. (1988). Limnologische untersuchungen ander Fulda unter
besonderer berücksichtigung der fischparasiten, Ihrer Wirtsspektren und
der Wassergüte. Dissertation. PhD Thesis. Üniversität Kassel.
[50] Van Dam H., Mertens A & Sinkeldam J. (1994). A coded checklist and
ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands.
Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133.
[51] Prygiel J., Coste M (1993) The assessment of water quality in the Artois-
Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiol.
269/279 343-349.
[52] Kelly, M. G., C. J. Penny, B. A. Whitton., 1995.Comparative
performance of benthic diatom indicesused to assess river water quality.
Hydrobiologia 302:179–188.
[53] Rakowska B., Szczepocka E. 2011. Demonstration of the Bzura River
restoration using diatom indices. Biologia 66(3): 411–417.
[54] Kwandrans J., Eloranta P., Kawecka B & Kryzsysztof W. (1998). Use of
benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of
southern Poland. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 193–201,
[55] Bere T & Tundisi JG. (2011b). Influence of land-use patterns on benthic
diatom communities and water quality in the tropical Monjolinho
hydrological basin, Sa˜o Carlos-SP, Brazil. Water SA 37: 93–102.
[56] Bella DV., Puccinelli C., Marcheggiani S., Mancini L. (2007). Benthic
diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in
wetlands of central Italy. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43 (2), 89-99.
[57] Vilbaste, S., Truu, J., Leisk, Ü. & Iital, A. 2007. Species composition
and diatom indices in relation to environmental parameters in Estonian
streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 161(3.4), 307.326.
[58] Rott, E., Pipp, E. and Pfister, P., 2003. Diatom methods developed for
river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical
trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algological studies, 110: 91–
115.
[59] Watanabe T., Asai K & Houki A. (1986). Numerical estimation of
organic pollution of flowing waters by using the epilithic diatom
assemblage – Diatom Assemblage Index (DIApo). Science of the Total
Environment 55: 209–218.
[60] Dell’Uomo A. (1996). Assessment of water quality of an Apennine river
as a pilot study. In Whitton, B. A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for
Monitoring Rivers II. Institut fu¨r Botanik, Universita¨t Innsbruck,
Innsbruck: 65–73.
[61] Go´mez N. & Licursi M. (2001). The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for
assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology 35: 173–
181.
[62] Walley WJ., Grbovic J & Eroski , S. (2001). A Reappraisal Of Saprobic
Values And Indicator Weights Based On Slovenian River Quality Data.
Wat. Res. Vol. 35, No. 18, Pp. 4285–4292.</p>
@article{"International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences:51380", author = "Hasan Kalyoncu and Burcu Şerbetci", title = "Applicability of Diatom-Based Water Quality Assessment Indices in Dari Stream, Isparta- Turkey", abstract = "Diatoms are an important group of aquatic ecosystems and diatom-based indices are increasingly becoming important tools for the assessment of ecological conditions in lotic systems. Although the studies are very limited about Turkish rivers, diatom indices were used for monitoring rivers in different basins. In the present study, we used OMNIDIA program for estimation of stream quality. Some indices have less sensitive (IDP, WAT, LOBO, GENRE, TID, CEE, PT), intermediate sensitivities (IDSE, DESCY, IPS, DI-CH, SLA, IDAP), the others higher sensitivities (SID, IBD, SHE, EPI-D). Among the investigated diatom communities, only a few taxa indicated alfa-mesosaprobity and polysaprobity. Most of the sites were characterized by a great relative contribution of eutraphent and tolerant ones as well as oligosaprobic and betamesosaprobic diatoms. In general, SID and IBD indices gave the best results. This study suggests that the structure of benthic diatom communities and diatom indices, especially SID, can be applied for monitoring rivers in Southern Turkey.
", keywords = "Diatom, Darı stream, OMNIDIA, Turkey, Water
quality.", volume = "7", number = "6", pages = "275-9", }
