Assessing the Impact of Quinoa Cultivation Adopted to Produce a Secure Food Crop and Poverty Reduction by Farmers in Rural Pakistan

Main purpose of this study was to assess adoption level of farmers for quinoa cultivation after they had been taught through training and visit extension approach. At this time of the 21st century, population structure, climate change, food requirements and eating habits of people are changing rapidly. In this scenario, farmers must play their key role in sustainable crop development and production through adoption of new crops that may also be helpful to overcome the issue of food insecurity as well as reducing poverty in rural areas. Its cultivation in Pakistan is at the early stages and there is a need to raise awareness among farmers to grow quinoa crops. In the middle of the 2015, a training and visit extension approach was used to raise awareness and convince farmers to grow quinoa in the area. During training and visit extension program, 80 farmers were randomly selected for the training of quinoa cultivation. Later on, these farmers trained 60 more farmers living into their neighborhood. After six months, a survey was conducted with all 140 farmers to assess the impact of the training and visit program on adoption level of respondents for the quinoa crop. The survey instrument was developed with the help of literature review and other experts of the crop. Validity and reliability of the instrument were checked before complete data collection. The data were analyzed by using SPSS. Multiple regression analysis was used for interpretation of the results from the survey, which indicated that factors like information/ training, change in agronomic and plant protection practices play a key role in the adoption of quinoa cultivation by respondents. In addition, the model explains more than 50% of variation in the adoption level of respondents. It is concluded that farmers need timely information for improved knowledge of agronomic and plant protection practices to adopt cultivation of the quinoa crop in the area.





References:
[1] Y.N. Musa, E. Aboki, I.A. Audu, The limitations and implications of training and visit (T&V) extension system in, Nigeria Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability 4 (2013) 67-76.
[2] S.S. Hussain, D. Byerlee, P.W. Heisey, Impacts of the training and visit extension system on farmers’ knowledge andadoption of technology: Evidence from Pakistan, Elsevier, Agricultural Economics 10 (1994) 39-47.
[3] E. Ashraf, G. B. Jackson, A. Afzal, In-service educational needs of agricultural officers for adaptation of remote sensing technology for precision agriculture in Balochistan – Pakistan, Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 28(2012) 353-360.
[4] S.E. Jacobsen, A. Mujica, New elaborated products from quinoa: protein concentrates and colorants. In: Abstracts/Proceedings of COST 814 Conference, Crop Development for Cool and Wet Regions of Europe. Pordenone, Italy, May 10–13, 44(2000) 517–520.
[5] S.A. Valencia-Chamorro, Quinoa: In Encyclopedia of Food Science and Nutrition, Academic Press, (2003) 4895–4902.
[6] M.J. Kozioł. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Food Composition Analysis, 5(1992)35–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-1575(92)90006-6, accessed on March 13, 2015.
[7] T.N. D'Altroy, C.A. Hastorf, The distribution and contents of Inca state storehouses in the Xauxa region of Peru. Am Antiq , 49(1984) 334–49.
[8] S.E. Jacobsen, The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev Int. 19(2003) 167–77 http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018883, accessed on March 22, 2015.
[9] K. Brady, C.T.Ho, R.T. Rosen, S. Sang, M.V. Karwe, Effects of processing on the nutraceutical profile of quinoa, Food Chem,.100(2007) 1209–1216.